The Ghost in the Machine

Mary Shelley On Ghosts Quote

Mary Shelley’s “On Ghosts” is an interesting little article/essay. It’s more of a meditation on: With all the scientific advancements, with all the mysteries being explained, do we truly not believe in ghosts anymore? She begins by pointing out that myths and legends are just that: myths and legends, stories once told by unenlightened cavemen. Mankind has moved beyond such superstitious storytelling.

Or has it?

Shelley argues that when the sun’s up and all is bright, illuminated, and logical, no one would really claim that ghosts exist. Or claim that the thought of ghosts might be terrifying. Then she says, “But let it be twelve at night in a lone house…”

And, all of a sudden, these logical people are believers.

Shelley goes on to explain that there are things we don’t know with our minds but we sense with our hearts:

Mary Shelley On Ghosts Quote 2

To me, this place “beyond the soul’s ken,” that vacuum where our hopes and fears rush in to fill the space, is where good stories come from. It’s the place that can’t be touched by the harsh light of reality. It’s the place where ghosts live.

We could talk for days about grammatical matters, syntactical structures, character or plot arcs. There are entire books about Outlining: The Pros and Cons! To adjective or not to adjective? This is the science of writing. These are the skills we are taught in elementary school. These are the things that constitute a writer’s “harsh light of day.” This is the science. Structural concerns are a concern and you must know them.  A writer needs them to tell stories.

But structural concerns are not the story.

I wish I had a great definition of a good story. But it’s more something you have to feel. And you know it when you feel it.

Think of it like this.

You’re standing on a beach. Ahead of you is the ocean.

Now. There are facts that you understand about the ocean. You can give its size in miles/kilometers. You can tell me how many fathoms deep it is. You can tell me the names of men who have sailed its surface. You can explain to me how the waves are created and the ways weather plays with surges and currents.

But, anyone who has stood on the shore and looked out over the vast expanse can tell you there’s something else there. You can’t explain why you feel so small. As if you cannot be separated from the insignificant grains of sand beneath you. But how you know, if you spread your arms, you’re as large as the horizon. That feeling, that sensation, is how a good story is.

What’s funny is that I started this post thinking I could try to explain something which Mary Shelley tries to capture too…but at the end of the day both of us fall woefully short.  (“…such is the list of our ignorance.”) Her essay is lovely, but she offers only anecdotal — story — evidence of ghosts at the end. There is no proof of anything except her own feelings, her belief that “influences do exist to watch and guard us, though they be impalpable to coarser faculties.”

And I am no Mary Shelley. At the end of the day, I guess it’s about building the machine — using structural pieces of a story — and then, in the gaps that are inevitably created there, trying to breathe “our hopes and fears, in gentle gales and terrific whirlwinds” to fill the space.

 


Posted

in

, ,

by

Comments

3 responses to “The Ghost in the Machine”

  1. Shannon Tellis Avatar

    I’ve tried for years to capture the difference between a grammatically correct story and a good story but to no effect. Thank you for capturing this so beautifully with the ocean analogy 🙂

  2. Daima Hussain Avatar

    I agree with you completely Shannon, I love the way good storytelling is explained in this article.

  3. Imber Avatar

    Well said!

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: